The assumption of normality in calculating value at risk

Authors

  • David Juárez Luna Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey-Campus Ciudad de México
  • Jose Carlos Ramirez Sánchez Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey-Campus Ciudad de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29201/peipn.v1i1.233

Keywords:

Value at risk, Normal distribution, Skewness, Kurtosis

Abstract

This paper shows that it is necessary to use different methods from the one proposed by RiskMetrics™ to calculate VaR because mexican stock market returns are not normally distributed. Firstly original distributions got transformed following the RiskMetrics™ suggestion. The EWMA model gives a better approximation to the normal distribution than the constant volatility model does. In addition, some models such as mixed normal distributions, the hyperbolic model, and the estimating functions model are tested to calculate VaR. The last one is the best model to measure extreme values in the stock distributions. Finally, a comparison among the models is presented in a box.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Campbell, Lo and Mackinlay, 1997. The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Johnston. J. and Dinardo J. 1997. Econometric Methods, McGraw Hill, Fourth Edition, Singapore.

Eberlein, E., Keller, U., Prause, K., (1998). “New Insights into Smile, Mispricing, and Value at Risk: The Hyperbolic Model”, Journal of Business, 1998, vol. 71, no. 3.

Hull, J. and White A., (1998). “Value at Risk When Daily Changes in Market Variables are not Normally Distributed”, Journal of Derivatives, No. 3, Spring 1998, pp. 9-19.

Hull, J., (2000). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall.

Jorion, P., (1997). “Value at Risk: the New Benchmark for Controlling Risk”, Richard D. Irwin.

J. P. Morgan (1996). “RiskMetrics, Technical Documentation”. Reuters/J. P. Morgan, Fourth Edition. N. Y.

Kupiec, P. (1995). “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models”, Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84.

Li, D., (1999). “Value at Risk Based on the Volatility, Skewness and Kurtosis”, Risk Metrics Group, New York.

Ramírez J.C. “Los problemas más comunes en el pronóstico de rendimientos de activos financieros con distribuciones no normales”. CIDE, DTE # 204.

Published

2005-01-03

How to Cite

Juárez Luna , D., & Ramirez Sánchez, J. C. (2005). The assumption of normality in calculating value at risk. Panorama Económico, 1(1), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.29201/peipn.v1i1.233

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.