Innovation Diffusion and International Trade: The Relationship Between Mexico and the United States

Authors

  • Humberto Ríos Bolívar Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Economía
  • Omar Neme Castillo Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Economía

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29201/peipn.v4i7.267

Keywords:

Innovation, diffusion, international trade, specialization, rate researchers

Abstract

This paper analyses the long run relation among innovation, technological diffusion and international trade, based on the ricardian specialization model of Eaton y Kortum (2007). Particularly, we apply cointegration techniques for estimating the determinants of researchers’ rate in Mexico inside the commercial relationship with United States in the period 1980-2006, and hence to establish the existence of stable relations among the considered variables. The rate at which ideas are created in United States is considerably higher than the rate in the Mexican economy. Nevertheless, researcher productivity seems higher in Mexico, although with less effectiveness for reducing costs. Considering differences in the rate of ideas’ creation between both economies which, in turn, affects researchers’ rate, we argue that Mexican economy specializes in researching inside the low and medium technology sectors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion, P. y P. Howitt (1992), “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, vol. 60-2, The Econometric Society.

Álvarez, F. y R. Lucas Jr. (2006), General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade, University of Chicago, USA.

Coe, D. y E. Helpman (1995), “International R&D Spillovers”, European Economic Review, vol. 39.

Cuthbertson, K., S. Hall y M. Taylor (1992), Applied Econometric Techniques, The University of Michigan Press.

Deardorff, V. (2007), The Ricardian Model, University of Michigan, USA.

Dombusch, R., S. Fischer y P. Samuelson (1977), “Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods”, American Economic Review, 67.

Eaton, J. y S. Kortum (1996), “Technology and Bilateral Trade”, Seminar Paper 96-18 CIES.

Eaton, J. y S. Kortum (1999), “International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement”, International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania vol. 40-3.

Eaton, J. y S. Kortum (2002), “Technology, Geography, and Trade”, Econometrica, vol. 70.

Eaton, J. y S. Kortum (2007), “Innovation, Diffusion, and Trade”, en Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and the Growth Mechanism if the Free-Enterprise Economics, editado por E. Sheshinski, R. Strom y W. Baumol, Princeton University Press.

Engle, R., D. Hendry y F. Richard (1983), “Exogeneity”, Econometrica, vol. 51-2. The Econometric Society.

Fransman, M. y K. King (1984), Technological Capability in the Third World, London: Macmillan.

Greenhalgh, C. (1990), “Innovation and Trade Performance in the United Kingdom”, Economic Journal, vol. 100.

Grossman, G. y E. Helpman (1991a), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Grossman, G. y E. Helpman (1991b), “Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth”, European Economic Review, vol. 35.

Grossman, G. y E. Helpman (1995), “Technology and Trade”, CEPR Discussion Paper no. 1134, London, Center for Economic Policy Research.

Harris, R. (1995), Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling, London: Prentice Hall Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Helpman, E. y P. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and International Economy, MIT Press. USA. International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania vol. 40-3.

Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 12-3.

Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Johansen, S. y K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 52-2.

Kortum, S. (1997), A Model of Research, Patenting, and Productivity Growth, Boston University-Institute for Economic Development.

Krugman, P. (1979), “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, vol.9.

Lefebvre, E., M. Bourgault y L. Lefebvre (1998), “R&D Related Capabilities as Determinants of Export Performance”, Small Business Economics, vol. 10.

Matsuyama, K. (1999), A Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods Under Nonhomothetic Preferences: Demand Complementarities, Income Distribution, and North-South Trade, Northwestern University, USA.

Posner, V. (1961), “International Trade and Technical Change”, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 3.

Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80.

Wakelin, K. (1998), “Innovation and Export Behavior at the Firm Level”, Research Policy, vol. 26.

Published

2008-07-07

How to Cite

Ríos Bolívar, H., & Neme Castillo, O. (2008). Innovation Diffusion and International Trade: The Relationship Between Mexico and the United States. Panorama Económico, 4(7), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.29201/peipn.v4i7.267

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.