Interaction between agricultural monetary support and poverty in the states with the highest agricultural production in Mexico (2020): a spatial econometric approach
Abstract
Several studies have documented the relationship between poverty and monetary support for the countryside. However, the literature that incorporates the territorial dimension of such variables is still scarce. The objective of this work is to explore the possible territorial interaction between the agricultural monetary support of the Production for Wellbeing program, aimed at agricultural producers, and poverty at the municipal level in the states with the highest agricultural production, Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Veracruz and Zacatecas. For this, the neighborhood spatial autoregressive model (SAR) is used. Based on Moran's I test, empirical evidence is found that in the states of Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Veracruz and Zacatecas the distribution of poverty and monetary support to agricultural producers has a significant spatial interaction. For the states of Jalisco and Michoacán it is observed that the estimated effect of the distribution of poverty and support is not significant, although the relationship is regressive and progressive, respectively. Since resource allocations to the program are channeled in fixed amounts to an established list of producers, SAR models are estimated independently by state. For states where the coefficients are not significant, a redesign of public policy with a territorial approach is suggested that promotes the Mexican agri-food system and at the same time reduces poverty by increasing food production.
Keywords
Array, Array, Array, Array, Array
References
- Anselin, L. (1980). Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures. Ithaca NY: Cornell University, Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series, No. 8.
- Anselin, L. (1988a). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
- Anselin, L. (1988b). Lagrange multiplier test diagnostic for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis, 20(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x.
- Anselin, L. and A. K. Bera (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics (eds.) Aman Ullah and D.E.A. Giles. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
- Anselin, L. and R. Florax (1995a). New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, Edi. Springer. Berlin.
- Anselin, L. and S.J. Rey (1997). Introduction to the special issue on spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 20(1, 2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769702000101.
- Campos V.; M. Raymundo; B. Delgado; H. Víctor y C. Medina (2020). Política social y combate a la pobreza en México: Análisis de la Cartilla Social. Gestión y Política Pública, 29(2): 355-386. https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v29i2.777.
- CEFP (2006). Programa de Apoyos Directos al Campo (PROCAMPO). Nota informativa. Disponible en: https://cefp.gob.mx/notas/2006/notacefp0772006.pdf.
- Cliff, A. and J. Ord (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London, Pion.
- Cliff A. and J. Ord (1981). Spatial Process. Models and Applications. London, Pion.
- CONEVAL (2021). La cohesión social.https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/paginas/cohesion_social.aspx.
- CONEVAL (2021). Pobreza a nivel municipio 2010-2020. Disponible en: https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/Pobreza-municipio-2010-2020.aspx.
- Custodio González, Carlos Alejandro (2023). Reconfiguración de las actividades agrícolas en México (1980-2015): una aproximación desde la estadística espacial. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 23(72): 521-546. https://doi.org/10.22136/est20231852.
- DOF (2003). Procedimiento para la actualización del Directorio del PROCAMPO. Disponible en: https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=687247.
- DOF (2010). Acuerdo por el que se emite la Clasificación Funcional del Gasto. Disponible en: https://www.conac.gob.mx/work/models/CONAC/normatividad/NOR_01_02_003.pdf.
- Govereh, J.; E. Malawo; T. Lungu; T. Jayne; K. Chinyama, and P. Chilonda (2009). Trends and spatial distribution of public agricultural spending in Zambia: Implications for agricultural productivity growth. ReSAKSS Working Paper No. 26.
- Pretoria: Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS).
- Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
- Mainardi, S. (2010). Cropland use, yields, and droughts: spatial data modeling for Burkina Faso and Niger. Agricultural Economics, 42(1): 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00465.x.
- Moreno-Serrano, R., y E. V. Vayá (2002). Econometría espacial: nuevas técnicas para el análisis regional. Una aplicación a las regiones europeas. Investigaciones Regionales, 1(otoño): 83-106.
- Paelinck, J.H.P, and L.H. Klaassen (1979). Spatial Econometrics. Farnborough, Saxon House.
- Quintana, V. M. y M. Solís (2023). Análisis de diferentes tipos de agricultura para la conceptualización de una nueva ruralidad en el norte de México: el caso de Chihuahua. Documentos de Proyectos (LC/TS.2023/68-LC/MEX/TS.2023/12), Ciudad de México, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), 2023.
- Roberts, M.J. (2008). Agricultural payments and land concentration: a semiparametric spatial regression analysis. Agricultural Payments and Land Concentration, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 90(3): 627-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01144.x.
- SADER (2021a). Diez razones para apostar por el cambio a favor del campo mexicano: comparativo Producción para el Bienestar versus PROCAMPO/PROAGRO. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/663825/Comparativo_bienestar_completo.pdf.
- SADER (2021). Regiones agroalimentarias de México. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/articulos/regiones-agroalimentarias-de-mexico?idiom=es.
- SAGARPA (2011). Evaluación Estratégica al Programa de Apoyos Directos al Campo PROCAMPO. Disponible en: https://www.agricultura.gob.mx/sites/default/files/sagar-pa/document/2018/11/14/1529/14112018-evaluacion-estrategica-procampo.pdf.
- SEMARNAT (2023). Espacio Digital Geográfico, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Disponible en: https://gisviewer.semarnat.gob.mx/geointegrador2Beta/index.html.
- Sen, A. (1996). "Capacidad y bienestar". En: Nussbaum, Martha y Sen, Amartya (Comp.). La calidad de vida, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- SIAP (2019). Ubicación y límites territoriales de la estructura de la SADER. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/siap/documentos/ubicacion-y-limites-territoriales-de-la-estructura-de-la-sagarpa2019.
- StataCorp (2023). Stata: Release 18. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
- Torres-Rojo, J.M.; C.A. Francisco-Cruz; Islas-Aguirre, J.F., Ramírez-Fuentes, G.A., and L. Pérez-Sosa (2020). A scale invariant model for the expansion of agricultural land and government spending on the agricultural sector. Land Use Policy, 92, 104438, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104438.
- Wardhana, D.; R. Ihle, and W. Heijman (2017). Agro-clusters and Rural Poverty: A Spatial Perspective for West Java. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(2): 161-186, https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1298722.